Leading Organizational Change for Modern GCC

Key difficulties include identifying and handling these risks efficiently, stabilizing worker requires with compliance, and adapting MTC guidelines for safe and secure and affordable movement. If handled well, remote work can be a strategic benefit for multinationals, providing operational continuity and access to talent. Relying on outdated guidelines could create liabilities, such as unanticipated tax direct exposure and compliance burdens.

Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.

Words by Kevin McKenna, Elder Advisor, EMIR Mirages often trick the eye in the desert, promising water and relief where there is none. Similarly, the Middle East, at the minute, can appear intimidating to global service leaders who mistakenly look at it as one uniform bloc. However unlike mirages, and in spite of geopolitical stress in the wider region, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' capacity is no illusion.

Leading Operational Excellence in the 2026 GCC

Numerous local leaders of international companies still have a hard time to unshackle themselves from mistaken beliefs and predispositions held by a worldwide HQ that typically looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. Global budget plan holders' typically misdirected viewpoints can lead to missed opportunities and impede growth. With over a decade of experience encouraging regional magnate in the Middle East, I've seen how crucial it is to make the case for the region by concentrating on these 5 basic actions.

ANSR July GCC PRs 50DR+

This place also operates very differently from our domestic market, so do not expect the same linear paths to development and timelines." This technique needs robust preparation, clear communication, a deep local network and a rich understanding of the local service environment because, eventually, you need to deliver on that guaranteed development.

By eliminating misunderstandings and engaging proactively, local CEOs can unlock the area's real potential, changing perceived mirages into a sanctuary of opportunities waiting to be discovered.

Set up a session with our experts to check out how YCP can help you in resolving your company obstacles.

Regarding Israel's controversial policies of restricting humanitarian help into Gaza, the Trump administration has actually followed Netanyahu's lead. Israel's full blockade of Gaza from March 2 through mid-May sparked a significant degeneration in humanitarian conditions. In May, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli- and U.S.-backed option to the UN aid circulation system in Gaza, started operations at 4 circulation sites.

Enterprise Strategy in the Evolving Middle East Landscape

Taken together, these policies reflect two linked aspects of the Trump administration's approach to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's preferences and a deprioritization of humanitarian needs. The administration has actually not pushed back on the Israeli government's strategies to inhabit Gaza City and by force leave Palestinians into a smaller sized location of Gaza.

He consequently published on social networks that the only method to get hostages out of Gaza is when Hamas is "faced and ruined," relatively offering indirect assistance for Israel's broadening operations. Meanwhile, the Trump administration's contented approach to Gaza's intensifying humanitarian situationmarked by a official declaration of famine in parts of Gazaunderscores the disastrous impact of its submission to the Israeli government's refusal to provide appropriate aid to the besieged area. They can best be captured by unpacking how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave responded. Not remarkably, their reactions differ substantially in all three cases. Their reactions likewise show the growing variation in between these two local powers as they pursue extensively differing techniques for how to shape the Middle East's emerging order.

It has signified a determination to use force whenever and any place hazards arise. This determination has translated into ever-bolder military interventions across the area that have redrawn the Middle East's balance of power. Israel has not translated these military gains into withstanding strategic wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's present center of gravitythe necessary for economic diversification has fueled a drive to de-escalate tensions in the area, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and goals to develop out business and trade ties throughout the Middle East and beyond.

Leading Operational Excellence in the 2026 Economy

As with Israel, however, whether and how Saudi Arabia translates its expanding take advantage of into enduring strategic gains remains to be seen. Israel was strongly supportive of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear centers.

ANSR July GCC PRs 50DR+

Going forward, Netanyahu will aim to maintain U.S. assistance, specifically if Iran starts to rebuild its ballistic missile arsenal or reboot enrichment. Israel has actually made clear that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either scenario. Absent a clear U.S. "red light" opposing more Israeli military intervention in Iran, potentially combined with a U.S.Increasingly, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the main threat to regional stability. Moving forward, Riyadh will push hard for a diplomatic resolution to Iran's dispute with the United States and Israel. While Saudi Arabia likely is heartened by Iran's weakened position, it views with alarm the prospect of deepening interstate conflict between Israel and Iran.